Shaquille O’Neal’s former mistress, Vanessa Lopez, plans on deposing the ex-NBA star’s Laker teammate, Kobe Bryant, in her lawsuit against Shaq.
Reports In Flex We Trust:
According to Jen Heger at RadarOnline:
Lopez filed a lawsuit against O’Neal in Orange County, Florida, for intentional infliction of emotional distress and assault. Lopez claims Shaq started harassing her shortly after she told him she thought she was pregnant. She says the former NBA center initially accused her of sleeping with someone else and when she broke off their relationship she claims the threats began. Shaq tried to get the lawsuit dismissed, but his motion was denied.
According to NBC Sports, during the criminal investigation Bryant allegedly told cops that Shaq “had paid up to $1 million in hush money to various women.” O’Neal denied the charge at the time and the rape charge against Brant was subsequently dropped after he reached an undisclosed financial settlement with the accuser. Lopez wants know what advice the retired basketball player gave to Bryant during the time he was under investigation for allegedly raping a woman in Colorado.
“There are plans to depose Kobe Bryant because he has information about advice Shaq allegedly gave him about paying off the woman who was accusing him of rape,” a source close to the situation tells Radar. “This goes to the heart of Vanessa’s claims against Shaq and the jury will definitely want to hear what Kobe has to say. There is still no love lost between Shaq and Kobe and the two men can barely stand to be in the same room together even though they have publicly said they have made up. Kobe doesn’t want to be dragged into Shaq’s mess.”
Lopez’s famed attorneys, Gloria Allred & Nathan Goldberg, have filed a motion asking that the trial be televised. The trial has been set for March 25, 2013. It’s expected that both O’Neal and Lopez will testify. A pretrial conference is scheduled for March 18, 2013.
I see said the blind man. And now…
This is EbenGregory.com…telling you in trials of fact, by oral testimony, the proper inquiry is not whether is it possible that the testimony may be false, but whether there is sufficient probability that it is true. Say word EbenGregory.